|
|
The Iodine Group | |
|
Home | Orthoiodosupplementation | Body | Disease | Special | Overviews |
||
|
|
THOMAS
Oxidation of Escherichia coli sulfhydryl components by the peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide-iodide antimicrobial system.Thomas EL, Aune TM. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):1006-10.
"The chemical modification of bacterial components was studied following incubation of Escherichia coli with the peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-iodide (I−) antimicrobial system or with iodine (I2). The oxidation of cell sulfhydryls and the iodination of cell components were measured. Both the peroxidase system and I2 oxidized sulfhydryls. When the I− concentration in the peroxidase system was greater than 100 μM, the peroxidase system and I2 were equivalent. That is, sulfhydryl oxidation or killing per mole of H2O2 equaled that per mole of I2. These results were consistent with peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of I− to yield 1 mol of I2 per mol of H2O2. Sulfhydryls were oxidized to yield sulfenic acids and free I−. With I− concentrations in the range of 10 to 100 μM, the amount of sulfhydryls oxidized by the peroxidase system could exceed the amount of I−. Because the oxidation of sulfhydryls to sulfenic acids did not consume I−, one I− ion could participate in the oxidation of many sulfhydryls. With I− concentrations lower than 10 μM, complete oxidation of sulfhydryls was not obtained. Incorporation of I− into iodinated derivatives of bacterial components partly depleted the system of I− and limited the formation of I2. These results indicated that antimicrobial activity was due to peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of I− to I2, followed by I2 oxidation of cell components. There was a direct relationship between sulfhydryl oxidation and antimicrobial action. Although iodination of bacterial components accompanied sulfhydryl oxidation, the amount of I− incorporation was not directly related to antimicrobial action. Also, incorporation of I− interfered with antimicrobial action at low I− concentrations."
Cofactor role of iodide in peroxidase antimicrobial action against Escherichia coli.Thomas EL, Aune TM. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Jun;13(6):1000-5.
"The mechanism of antimicrobial activity of the peroxidase-hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-iodide (I−) system was investigated. Inhibition of respiration and loss of viability of Escherichia coli were used as measures of antimicrobial activity. Because the bacteria destroyed H2O2, peroxidase antimicrobial action depended on the competition for H2O2 between the bacteria and the peroxidase. Utilization of H2O2 by the peroxidase was favored by (i) increasing either the peroxidase or the I− concentration, so as to increase the rate of oxidation of I−, (ii) lowering the temperature to lower the rate of destruction of H2O2 by the bacteria, and (iii) adding H2O2 in small increments so as to avoid a large excess of H2O2 relative to I−. When utilization of H2O2 by the peroxidase system was favored, the peroxidase system and iodine (I2) were equivalent. That is, antimicrobial action per mole of H2O2 equaled that per mole of I2. Also, identical antimicrobial action was obtained either by incubating the bacteria directly with the peroxidase system or by preincubating the peroxidase system so as to form I2 and then adding the bacteria. On the other hand, peroxidase antimicrobial action could be obtained at low I− concentrations. These I− concentrations were lower than the concentration of I2 that was required for antimicrobial action. It is proposed that peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of I− yields I2, which reacts with bacterial components to yield the oxidized components and I−. The I− that is released can be reoxidized and participate again in the oxidation of bacterial components. In this way, I− acts as a cofactor in the peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of bacterial components."
Susceptibility of Escherichia coli to bactericidal action of lactoperoxidase, peroxide, and iodide or thiocyanate.Thomas EL, Aune TM. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Feb;13(2):261-5.
"The bactericidal action that results from lactoperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation of iodide or thiocyanate was studied, using Escherichia coli as the test organism. The susceptibility of intact cells to bactericidal action was compared with that of cells with altered cell envelopes. Exposure to ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, to lysozyme and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, or to osmotic shock were used to alter the cell envelope. Bactericidal action was greatly increased when the cells were exposed to the lactoperoxidase-peroxide-iodide system at low temperatures, low cell density, or after alteration of the cell envelope. When thiocyanate was substituted for iodide, bactericidal activity was observed only at low cell density or after osmotic shock. Low temperature and low cell density lowered the rate of destruction of peroxide by the bacteria. Therefore, competition for peroxide between the bacteria and lactoperoxidase may influence the extent of bactericidal action. Alteration of the cell envelope had only a small effect on the rate of destruction of peroxide. Instead, the increased susceptibility of these altered cells suggested that bactericidal action required permeation of a reagent through the cell envelope. In addition to altering the cell envelope, these procedures partly depleted cells of oxidizable substrates and sulfhydryl components. Adding an oxidizable substrate did not decrease the susceptibility of the altered cells. On the other hand, mild reducing agents such as sulfhydryl compounds did partly reverse bactericidal action when added after exposure of cells to the peroxidase systems. These studies indicate that alteration of the metabolism, structure, or composition of bacterial cells can greatly increase their susceptibility to peroxidase bactericidal action."
|
|
Home | Orthoiodosupplementation | Body | Disease | Special Topics | OverviewsThe Iodine Group | Books | Disclaimers | Contact Us | Search
|
||
